As the global steel industry faces increasing pressure to decarbonize, new renewable carbon solutions are entering the conversation. Two terms often come up—biochar and biocarbon—but they are not interchangeable. While both are derived from biomass and offer carbon-negative pathways, their properties and applications differ significantly.

This article explains the key differences between biochar and biocarbon, and answers the most important question: which one is truly suited for steelmakers looking to cut emissions while maintaining metallurgical performance?

What is Biochar?

Biochar is a carbon-rich material produced through pyrolysis, a process that heats organic biomass (wood, crop residues, nutshells) in low-oxygen conditions. Its structure is highly porous, making it ideal for:

- Soil health: retaining water, nutrients, and hosting beneficial microbes.

- Carbon sequestration: locking atmospheric CO₂ into a stable solid form that can remain in soils for centuries.

- Environmental remediation: capturing pollutants and improving water quality.

Key Fact: Biochar is primarily used in agriculture and environmental projects, not heavy industry.

What is Biocarbon?

Biocarbon is an engineered, upgraded form of biochar, optimized for industrial use—especially in high-temperature processes like steelmaking and cement. Through refining, densification, and sometimes blending, biochar can be transformed into:

- Biocarbon pellets or briquettes

- Biocoke (a renewable substitute for metallurgical coke)

- Injection-grade carbon fines

These products are designed to withstand the mechanical, thermal, and chemical demands of blast furnaces and electric arc furnaces.

Key Fact: Biocarbon is the industrial-grade cousin of biochar, purpose-built for heavy industry.

Why the Steel Industry Needs Biocarbon (Not Raw Biochar)

Steelmaking consumes enormous amounts of carbon, primarily in the form of metallurgical coke. Replacing this fossil carbon with a renewable alternative is one of the most direct ways to cut the sector’s 8% share of global CO₂ emissions.

However, not every carbon-rich material works. To be viable in steelmaking, a carbon source must:

- Have high fixed carbon content (80–90%+).

- Be low in ash and impurities (like sulfur, chlorine, heavy metals).

- Offer the right mechanical strength for furnace charging.

- Be produced at industrial scale, with consistent quality.

Raw biochar, while excellent for soils, often falls short on these metrics. Biocarbon, by contrast, is specifically engineered to meet them.

Attribute Biochar Biocarbon
Feedstock Agricultural residues, forestry waste Same, but further refined and densified
Production Process Pyrolysis Pyrolysis + upgrading (pelletizing, briquetting)
Primary Use Soil amendment, carbon removal, remediation Steelmaking, cement, heavy industry
Carbon Content 60–75% 80–90%+
Ash Content Can be high and variable Low, engineered for metallurgical standards
Form Loose char, powder, granules Briquettes, pellets, biocoke, injection fines
Durability Fragile, not suitable for furnaces Strong, designed for high-temperature applications

Biochar vs. Biocarbon — Steelmaking FAQ

Clear answers for procurement, operations, and sustainability teams.

Can steelmakers use raw biochar directly in furnaces?

Generally no. Raw biochar isn’t engineered for furnaces—it’s lower density, variable in ash/volatiles, and prone to breakage under load. Steel plants need an industrial-grade carbon with consistent specs and mechanical strength.

What is biocarbon and how is it different from biochar?

Biocarbon is upgraded biochar built for industry. Through screening, blending, and densification (pellets, briquettes, biocoke, or injection fines), it delivers high fixed carbon, low ash, and the durability steel operations require.

Where does biocarbon fit in steelmaking?

Biocarbon is used as charge carbon in BF/BOF, as injection carbon, and as a coke/anthracite substitute in EAF. Plants deploy it to lower fossil CO₂ while maintaining stable throughput and yield.

What specs matter most?

Target high fixed carbon (often 80–90%+), low ash and trace elements (S, Cl, heavy metals), controlled size distribution, low fines for charging, and sufficient cold compressive strength for handling and logistics.

Will biocarbon impact furnace performance?

With the right specification, biocarbon delivers comparable metallurgical performance. Early users report stable operations alongside measurable reductions in fossil CO₂ intensity per ton of steel.

How is biochar upgraded into biocarbon?

Feedstocks are qualified and blended to manage ash/metals, then densified via pelletizing or briquetting. Binder systems are tuned for strength and reactivity, and lots are QA/QC’d to a repeatable spec.

Is supply scalable and bankable?

Yes. Biocarbon leverages forestry and agricultural residues with standardized production and testing. Karmanterra structures multi-year programs with consistent specs and auditable emissions accounting.

When is biochar the better choice?

Choose biochar for agriculture, carbon removal, and environmental applications. For high-temperature metallurgy, select engineered biocarbon that meets furnace-ready specifications.

The Bottom Line: Which One Do Steelmakers Really Need?

While biochar plays a critical role in agriculture and climate-smart farming, it is biocarbon that steelmakers require to decarbonize production.

For a sector under intense pressure to meet net-zero commitments, biocarbon provides a direct, scalable pathway to replacing fossil coke with renewable carbon. The future of low-carbon steel will not be built on fossil fuels. It will rely on engineered renewable carbon products like biocarbon, derived from biochar but optimized for heavy industry. Steelmakers who make the shift today are not only reducing their emissions but also gaining a competitive advantage in a world where green steel is rapidly becoming the standard.

In short: biochar and biocarbon are both essential—but only biocarbon meets the exacting standards of steel.

‍